Username:

Password:

 
   
   
  







home choirs events videos choreographers arrangers costumes social songs search

 




   Participants

We do not have a list of groups that attended this event on this day.
  Show Choir Community    Events    2009 Season    DeKalb Show Choir Invitational 2009


   Event Info



February 14th, 2009


Venue Info

DeKalb High School
3424 County Road 427
Waterloo, IN 46793

Phone: (260) 925-2363

Event Details

No. of Attending Choirs:

  20 Mixed Groups
  8 Treble Groups
  3 Middle School Groups

Hosts:

  DeKalb "Classic Connection"
  DeKalb "Sound Sensation"

Judges:

  Paul Gulsvig

  Kevin Butler

  Marty DeMott

  Shawn Eck

  Jeremy Western

  Rick Seaver (Tier II/Womens)

  J.D. Smith (Tier II/Womens)

  Alex Hall (Tier II/Womens)

  Abby Ehinger (Tier II/Womens)


Tickets

Day $8.00
Night $8.00
All Day/Night $14.00

Map



DeKalb Show Choir Invitational 2009









Awards
Predictions
Photos
Event Site
Live Stream


   Finals

  

Groups in order of placement

 Expressions
 Buffalo Grove High School
Grand Champion 
Best Vocals 
Best Choreography 

 Sound Check
 Waubonsie Valley High School
First Runner Up 

 Swingers Unlimited
 Marysville High School
Second Runner Up 

 F.C. Singers
 Franklin Central High School
3rd Runner Up 
Best Crew 

 Elite Energy
 Eisenhower High School
4th Runner Up 
Best Band 

 Music Warehouse
 Edgewood High School
5th Runner Up 


   Mixed Division - Tier I (Prelims)





   Mixed Division - Tier II

  

Groups

 Knight Rhythms
 East Noble High School
First Place 
Best Vocals 
Best Choreography 

 Sound Edition
 New Haven High School
Second Place 
Best Female Soloist 
Best Male Soloist 

 Sound Wave
 Twin Lakes High School
Third Place 

 Flash 'n Fascination

 Martinsville High School
No Placement 

 Warrior Ambition

 Woodlan Jr/Sr High School
No Placement 

 New Edition

 Edgewood High School
No Placement 


   Treble Division

  

Groups

 High Voltage
 Franklin Central High School
First Place 
Best Vocals 

 Sophisticated Ladies
 Edgewood High School
Second Place 
Best Choreography 

 Girls in Heels
 Waubonsie Valley High School
Third Place 

 Rhythm Connection

 Garrett High School
No Placement 

 Premiere Edition

 East Noble High School
No Placement 

 Ville de Filles

 Northrop High School
No Placement 

 Simply Chic

 Southport High School
No Placement 

 Select Sound

 Carroll High School
No Placement 


   Middle School Division

  

Groups

 Mini Warehouse
 Edgewood Junior High School
First Place 
Best Vocals 
Best Choreography 
Best Male Soloist 

 Mini Swingers
 Bunsold Middle School
Second Place 

 Class Act
 Woodside/Summit Middle School
Third Place 
Best Female Soloist 


   Attending Members

No members signed up for this event.

209 comments • Sort by

Prev 1 . . . 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next



tj on Feb 7, 2009, 3:23 PM
Post #89
 
Medina's coming and were going to leave everything we have on that stage!
and watch out for our combo, we are pretty good! " border="0" alt="ph34r.gif" />

I cant wait for this competition though!!




KEVDOUG on Feb 6, 2009, 3:43 PM
Post #88
 
QUOTE(Mr. Step @ Feb 3 2009, 12:02 PM) 451415
The ISSMA scoresheet scores two captions, Vocal and Visual. caption carries 200 points. 100 points for Technique and 100 points for Artistry. You gain the points through boxes which designate your execution of performance and what points are appropriate for that execution. For example, vocal boxes for technique contain tone quality, intonation, diction, vowel uniformity etc. The artistry box contains areas like phrasing, dynamics, etc. Box 1 or 2 generally means bad execution of these things with boxes 3 and 4 being mediocre. A solid score would be a Box 4 which I believe is 80-90 points and the best being Box 5 which is 90 to 100 points. The same goes for the Visual captions. The visual boxes are different b/c they don't just simply score choreography. It really does score ALL of the visual aspects of the show including choreo (style, creativity, originality, and execution), staging, blocking, formations, props, transitions, costumes, etc. Most scoresheets would break all that up and give each area something like 10 points. That's one of the quirks I was referring to. Also, at the end of contests scores are then weighted so that the final tally is 60% vocal and 40% visual.



The thing that I ABSOLUTELY hate about this is that it seems to only give points for 2 things. What about the other aspects of show choir like the set, combo, show concept. Technically you could just throw a show of 5 random songs together and win. This sheet doesn't take in to effect the quality of the show formation and concept.

In the past many Ohio groups have not faired so well in Indiana at ISSMA contests. I know Teays and Findlay have had some upsets in Indiana in the past. Who knows but I hope it is not a long day for the Ohio schools. I hope they can have some major success.


S

sequinlover on Feb 6, 2009, 3:37 PM
Post #87
 
QUOTE(show choirstud2004 @ Feb 3 2009, 02:33 PM) 451489
This will be Edgewood's 2nd time out. They are competing @ Danville this weekend.

I hope they shake off the rust and come out strong @ DeKalb and Danville.


Could happen that Edgewood gets in. I know that the last two times Edgewood came up against Carroll they (Edgewood) won by a small margin. Dekalb will be Carroll's thrid time out, but I haven't seen them yet this year...and there is that whole new choreographer thing for them. It will be fun to watch.

Now that I know the judges, I think it will be Carroll or Edgewood in the 5th spot.


S

sequinlover on Feb 6, 2009, 3:30 PM
Post #86
 
QUOTE(show choirstud2004 @ Feb 3 2009, 02:33 PM) 451489
This will be Edgewood's 2nd time out. They are competing @ Danville this weekend.

I hope they shake off the rust and come out strong @ DeKalb and Danville.



M

music.choir.love on Feb 6, 2009, 10:32 AM
Post #85
 
QUOTE(neweraguy @ Jan 26 2009, 08:46 AM) 449094
Good Luck to all the groups going!!



you're so nice.
=>


C

chsman1818 on Feb 4, 2009, 9:53 PM
Post #84
 
QUOTE(Mr. Step @ Feb 3 2009, 09:02 AM) 451415
haha... " border="0" alt="laugh.gif" />
I will agree that the ISSMA scoring sheet def. has its quirks but I don't find it non-sensical. I would think that the objectivity is possesses would be a selling point. Haven't we all at some point seen or complained about adjudicators being far too subjective in their scoring. Anyway, just to educate those who aren't aware;

The ISSMA scoresheet scores two captions, Vocal and Visual. caption carries 200 points. 100 points for Technique and 100 points for Artistry. You gain the points through boxes which designate your execution of performance and what points are appropriate for that execution. For example, vocal boxes for technique contain tone quality, intonation, diction, vowel uniformity etc. The artistry box contains areas like phrasing, dynamics, etc. Box 1 or 2 generally means bad execution of these things with boxes 3 and 4 being mediocre. A solid score would be a Box 4 which I believe is 80-90 points and the best being Box 5 which is 90 to 100 points. The same goes for the Visual captions. The visual boxes are different b/c they don't just simply score choreography. It really does score ALL of the visual aspects of the show including choreo (style, creativity, originality, and execution), staging, blocking, formations, props, transitions, costumes, etc. Most scoresheets would break all that up and give each area something like 10 points. That's one of the quirks I was referring to. Also, at the end of contests scores are then weighted so that the final tally is 60% vocal and 40% visual.
Also, I can say that with this scoresheet, usually the best and most balanced (vocal vs. visual) ensemble at the contest wins, e.g. Carmel at State the last two years. With that said, usually the ensemble who wins the Vocal captions goes on to win the contest. I've only seen one instance where that did not happen. Central Sound Classic last season, Center Grove won Vocals but didn't win GC. However the point spread between them and NC was so close that it didn't really matter who won vocals I guess.

To my knowledge the scoresheet has been revised every year since its inception so changes and improvements have been made and they are continuously on the radar. They're a couple areas on the scoresheet that I'm not so partial to but hey..what can you do. I will say that ISSMA is really good about getting feedback from directors, choreographers, judges, arrangers, etc. on what constitutes a fair score sheet and what areas should be included within the boxes on the sheet. So with my rant over, here are my predicts for Dekalb. I wish I was going

GC-WV..I'm not partial to their show design but they are really a balanced group and seem to compete well. Not to mention that this is like their third contest so they should have a good hold on their set.
1RU- EEE..I love their song selection but I'm not sure if they can beat WV vocally. They should be right in there with visuals though.
2RU BG...they always have a great total package. Not quite sure if they have enough vocally or visually to truly stand out though
3RU-Marysville..I LOVE Marysville but it seems that its taking them a minute to get into the groove of their show AND competition. I would love to see them breakout here with a good result but I will go with the trends
4RU-FC...not usually into their style but they started off strong with the win at South Dearborn. This weekend at Churubusco should be interesting to see if they still have the edge over Center Grove
5RU-Carroll..that's an off pick and under most circumstances I would def. pick Edgewood but the last several years they haven't come out the gate "turning it out". With their first comp. being one containing groups of this caliber it's going to be a tough one for them. So I hope they are ready. Also, Damon Brown groups like Carroll usually come out looking pretty clean which is why I give the edge to them



Just wanted to point out a quick mistake in the above. This year Carroll is not being choreographed by Damon Brown. The mixed group was choreographed by Tara Tober and Mike Weaver. Just wanted to point that out to everyone.




The Ethan Price on Feb 4, 2009, 9:14 PM
Post #83
 
QUOTE(JakeKern @ Feb 4 2009, 07:39 PM) 451788
Judging the Championship Division:

Paul Gulsvig
Kevin Butler
Marty DeMott
Shawn Eck
Jeremy Western


Paul and Shawn are two amazing guys. Met Paul at SCA and Shawn has been our choreographer for three years. Amazing guys that will do a fabulous job at judging!




Ilovetosing88 on Feb 4, 2009, 9:08 PM
Post #82
 
what judges will be doing vocals? and what judges be doing Choreography? ETC......

Thanks!




JakeKern on Feb 4, 2009, 8:39 PM
Post #81
 
I saw that there were some questions about ticket prices and judges and thought I'd provide the info. I just got an email back from our contest chairman and here are the answers. Anything else, reply or msg me and I'll see what I can do.


Regular Price at Door:
Day $8.00
Night $8.00
All Day/Night $14.00


Judges for the contest are as follows:


Judging the Championship Division:

Paul Gulsvig
Kevin Butler
Marty DeMott
Shawn Eck
Jeremy Western


Judging Varsity Division, Girls, and Middle School:

Rick Seaver
James D.Smith
Alex Hall
Abby Ehinger

Solo Judge:
Mindy Cox


S

strangertotherain on Feb 4, 2009, 5:16 PM
Post #80
 
i'm from buffalo grove and i just want to say that we know how we placed at mt.zion has nothing to do with how people predict our ranks for this competition. its completely different judges and judging in general. no one knows what will happen next weekend. so idk who khoirking is but please disregard his opinion for making us sound stuck up or anything like that. thats not how we are at all.
on that note...haha i cant wait to see everyones shows and good luck to all! Dekalb is always such a fun comp.


C

ChartWriter421 on Feb 4, 2009, 8:34 AM
Post #79
 
Has someone already posted who is judging this contest? If so, I apolgize - please redirect to the right place. But inquiring minds are wondering who is the panel scoring both in the gym AND in the auditorium.



Jorge on Feb 4, 2009, 12:57 AM
Post #78
 
QUOTE(KhoirKing @ Feb 3 2009, 09:38 PM) 451573
Mr. Step,

Thanks for the excellent explanation about the ISSMA scoring, it was very helpful!

In reference to one of the groups competing at DeKalb, Buffalo Grove, I wanted to tell you a few things about their trip to the Mt. Zion Invitational. They finished as first runner up (placing ahead of EEE), they had the Grand Champion Female Soloist, Best Crew and also won the coveted "People's Choice Award". They've also got a new posting on Youtube of their performance at Mt. Z, so go there, take it in and you just may move them up a notch or two in your rankings!


"People's Choice Award" is NOT a coveted award.

Tell us who you are "KhoirKing". We know you aren't "Fred Astaire" as your profile says... and if a moderator does an IP search and finds out that you represent the school you brag about, you're going to be feeling pretty lousy when all your classmates find out what a fool you've been on SCC.


K

KhoirKing on Feb 3, 2009, 10:38 PM
Post #77
 
Mr. Step,

Thanks for the excellent explanation about the ISSMA scoring, it was very helpful!

In reference to one of the groups competing at DeKalb, Buffalo Grove, I wanted to tell you a few things about their trip to the Mt. Zion Invitational. They finished as first runner up (placing ahead of EEE), they had the Grand Champion Female Soloist, Best Crew and also won the coveted "People's Choice Award". They've also got a new posting on Youtube of their performance at Mt. Z, so go there, take it in and you just may move them up a notch or two in your rankings!


K

KhoirKing on Feb 3, 2009, 10:22 PM
Post #76
 
QUOTE(Mr. Step @ Feb 3 2009, 11:02 AM) 451415
haha... " border="0" alt="laugh.gif" />
I will agree that the ISSMA scoring sheet def. has its quirks but I don't find it non-sensical. I would think that the objectivity is possesses would be a selling point. Haven't we all at some point seen or complained about adjudicators being far too subjective in their scoring. Anyway, just to educate those who aren't aware;

The ISSMA scoresheet scores two captions, Vocal and Visual. caption carries 200 points. 100 points for Technique and 100 points for Artistry. You gain the points through boxes which designate your execution of performance and what points are appropriate for that execution. For example, vocal boxes for technique contain tone quality, intonation, diction, vowel uniformity etc. The artistry box contains areas like phrasing, dynamics, etc. Box 1 or 2 generally means bad execution of these things with boxes 3 and 4 being mediocre. A solid score would be a Box 4 which I believe is 80-90 points and the best being Box 5 which is 90 to 100 points. The same goes for the Visual captions. The visual boxes are different b/c they don't just simply score choreography. It really does score ALL of the visual aspects of the show including choreo (style, creativity, originality, and execution), staging, blocking, formations, props, transitions, costumes, etc. Most scoresheets would break all that up and give each area something like 10 points. That's one of the quirks I was referring to. Also, at the end of contests scores are then weighted so that the final tally is 60% vocal and 40% visual.
Also, I can say that with this scoresheet, usually the best and most balanced (vocal vs. visual) ensemble at the contest wins, e.g. Carmel at State the last two years. With that said, usually the ensemble who wins the Vocal captions goes on to win the contest. I've only seen one instance where that did not happen. Central Sound Classic last season, Center Grove won Vocals but didn't win GC. However the point spread between them and NC was so close that it didn't really matter who won vocals I guess.

To my knowledge the scoresheet has been revised every year since its inception so changes and improvements have been made and they are continuously on the radar. They're a couple areas on the scoresheet that I'm not so partial to but hey..what can you do. I will say that ISSMA is really good about getting feedback from directors, choreographers, judges, arrangers, etc. on what constitutes a fair score sheet and what areas should be included within the boxes on the sheet. So with my rant over, here are my predicts for Dekalb. I wish I was going

GC-WV..I'm not partial to their show design but they are really a balanced group and seem to compete well. Not to mention that this is like their third contest so they should have a good hold on their set.
1RU- EEE..I love their song selection but I'm not sure if they can beat WV vocally. They should be right in there with visuals though.
2RU BG...they always have a great total package. Not quite sure if they have enough vocally or visually to truly stand out though
3RU-Marysville..I LOVE Marysville but it seems that its taking them a minute to get into the groove of their show AND competition. I would love to see them breakout here with a good result but I will go with the trends
4RU-FC...not usually into their style but they started off strong with the win at South Dearborn. This weekend at Churubusco should be interesting to see if they still have the edge over Center Grove
5RU-Carroll..that's an off pick and under most circumstances I would def. pick Edgewood but the last several years they haven't come out the gate "turning it out". With their first comp. being one containing groups of this caliber it's going to be a tough one for them. So I hope they are ready. Also, Damon Brown groups like Carroll usually come out looking pretty clean which is why I give the edge to them



T

tscott on Feb 3, 2009, 6:14 PM (Edited)
Post #75
 
Part of the ISSMA score sheet problems are the instructions to the judges. I understand they are told at competitions early in the season that no one should receive any scores in Box 5. No matter that a choir might be full of experienced seniors, have had a productive fall, or just give a terrific performance, ISSMA seems to think no one could be worthy early on.



Kyle-By-Request on Feb 3, 2009, 6:09 PM
Post #74
 
Prediction:
GC- Waubonsie Valley
1RU- Eisenhower
2RU- Marysville
3RU- Buffallo Grove
4RU- Franklin Central
5RU- Edgewood

Vocals- Waubonsie Valley
Visuals- Waubonsie Valley/Eisenhower




MusicWarehouse2006 on Feb 3, 2009, 5:33 PM
Post #73
 
QUOTE(sequinlover @ Feb 2 2009, 03:30 PM) 451210
Finals Predictions!

I think Franklin Central, Buffalo Grove, Eisenhower, and Waubonsie are shoe ins for finals baring anything catastrophic. That leaves 2 open spots. Northrop, Marysville, Edgewood and Carroll are the most likely to fill those spots. Based on the schedule and the judges that have been at Dekalb in the past, I would say Carroll has a good shot and I will guess Marysville. From postings I have read, this will be Edgewood's fist time out and that is always hard. I think that the early time slot and the double performance schedule could hurt Northrop. Just guessing though. They are all good groups and I haven't personally seen any of them yet this year.

Good Luck!


This will be Edgewood's 2nd time out. They are competing @ Danville this weekend.

I hope they shake off the rust and come out strong @ DeKalb and Danville.


M

Mr. Step on Feb 3, 2009, 12:02 PM (Edited)
Post #72
 
QUOTE(KEVDOUG @ Feb 2 2009, 11:18 PM) 451326
Don't ask... lol


haha... " border="0" alt="laugh.gif" />

QUOTE(ThomasShimmel @ Feb 3 2009, 08:41 AM) 451403
You don't even want to know how they score this event... It is the most objective score sheet, with weird points, and it makes no sense


I will agree that the ISSMA scoring sheet def. has its quirks but I don't find it non-sensical. I would think that the objectivity is possesses would be a selling point. Haven't we all at some point seen or complained about adjudicators being far too subjective in their scoring. Anyway, just to educate those who aren't aware;

The ISSMA scoresheet scores two captions, Vocal and Visual. caption carries 200 points. 100 points for Technique and 100 points for Artistry. You gain the points through boxes which designate your execution of performance and what points are appropriate for that execution. For example, vocal boxes for technique contain tone quality, intonation, diction, vowel uniformity etc. The artistry box contains areas like phrasing, dynamics, etc. Box 1 or 2 generally means bad execution of these things with boxes 3 and 4 being mediocre. A solid score would be a Box 4 which I believe is 80-90 points and the best being Box 5 which is 90 to 100 points. The same goes for the Visual captions. The visual boxes are different b/c they don't just simply score choreography. It really does score ALL of the visual aspects of the show including choreo (style, creativity, originality, and execution), staging, blocking, formations, props, transitions, costumes, etc. Most scoresheets would break all that up and give each area something like 10 points. That's one of the quirks I was referring to. Also, at the end of contests scores are then weighted so that the final tally is 60% vocal and 40% visual.


Also, I can say that with this scoresheet, usually the best and most balanced (vocal vs. visual) ensemble at the contest wins, e.g. Carmel at State the last two years. With that said, usually the ensemble who wins the Vocal captions goes on to win the contest. I've only seen one instance where that did not happen. Central Sound Classic last season, Center Grove won Vocals but didn't win GC. However the point spread between them and NC was so close that it didn't really matter who won vocals I guess.

To my knowledge the scoresheet has been revised every year since its inception so changes and improvements have been made and they are continuously on the radar. They're a couple areas on the scoresheet that I'm not so partial to but hey..what can you do. I will say that ISSMA is really good about getting feedback from directors, choreographers, judges, arrangers, etc. on what constitutes a fair score sheet and what areas should be included within the boxes on the sheet. So with my rant over, here are my predicts for Dekalb. I wish I was going

GC-WV..I'm not partial to their show design but they are really a balanced group and seem to compete well. Not to mention that this is like their third contest so they should have a good hold on their set.
1RU- EEE..I love their song selection but I'm not sure if they can beat WV vocally. They should be right in there with visuals though.
2RU BG...they always have a great total package. Not quite sure if they have enough vocally or visually to truly stand out though
3RU-Marysville..I LOVE Marysville but it seems that its taking them a minute to get into the groove of their show AND competition. I would love to see them breakout here with a good result but I will go with the trends
4RU-FC...not usually into their style but they started off strong with the win at South Dearborn. This weekend at Churubusco should be interesting to see if they still have the edge over Center Grove
5RU-Carroll..that's an off pick and under most circumstances I would def. pick Edgewood but the last several years they haven't come out the gate "turning it out". With their first comp. being one containing groups of this caliber it's going to be a tough one for them. So I hope they are ready.


T

ThomasShimmel on Feb 3, 2009, 8:41 AM
Post #71
 
You don't even want to know how they score this event... It is the most objective score sheet, with weird points, and it makes no sense



KEVDOUG on Feb 2, 2009, 11:18 PM
Post #70
 
QUOTE(imluvinACW @ Feb 2 2009, 05:16 PM) 451236
What is the "controversial ISMMA scoring"?


Don't ask... lol



Prev 1 . . . 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next



Sponsored







©2002-2024 Show Choir Community. All Rights Reserved.